But the piece was deemed reductive and moralistic for blaming breakdowns in family life on porn consumption. They are the crack babies of porn. It also focused solely on the harmful effects its authors believe porn could have on men despite acknowledging research showing women are increasingly watching adult content. They justified excluding women from their message by suggesting those who did consume porn reported watching less explicit content. The essay has provoked a strong reaction among members of the adult industry and campaigners, some of whom have spoken to the Independent about why they believe Anderson and Boteach are misdirected in blaming problematic behaviours on porn.

Your question may be answered by sellers, manufacturers, or customers who purchased this item, who are all part of the Amazon community. Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway. Please enter a question.

Your question may be answered by sellers, manufacturers, or customers who purchased this item, who are all part of the Amazon community. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. Please enter a question.